Traditional diplomacy

The emergence of a defined diplomatic process is impossible to date as, throughout history differing models of diplomatic practice have emerged each demanding independent definition. The prevailing paradigm which surrounds the ‘old diplomacy’ is that of subterfuge and bilateralism. Traditionally diplomacy was conducted privately with embassies being utilized as platforms for information gathering. Historically states were actors in a boundless world making realist principles of self interest central to foreign relations as, expansion and regional security where integral to preserve power. The Italian system was the first to adopt resident embassies in sister republics affording opportunities to gain geographical influence. Exponents of modern diplomacy argue that this form of direct personal mediation is deeply deemphasised in the globalizing world. The prevalence of air travel and telecommunications allows leaders to communicate directly and participate in summitry diplomacy more readily.

Aspects of traditional diplomacy have prevailed to the modern day. Kissinger places a high value on the advantages of private diplomacy in being able to circumvent popular dissatisfaction in search for lasting resolutions. The nature of private diplomacy requires a certain level of bilateral discord which has profound consequences for an international ‘community.’ Despite the ends that might be sought by secret bilateral diplomacy this undoubtedly leads to splintered relations. In an age where public diplomacy has increasing influence the impact of secretive deals could mean irreparable damage to a state, organization or regime. The invasion of Iraq was essentially a bilateral endeavour and the consequences of civil descent have had lasting and profound damage on the Labour and Republican party’s image.

The nature of globalization demands a fundamental shift and rebranding of diplomacy to the public forum as an open and honest process. To retain support for policies and government the role of popular politics is essentially more relevant. This can be displayed by Obama’s using popular support to clinch his economic rescue package. As we and others proactively participate in shaping politics and civil society the approach of our elected governments must evolve to survive these changes.